The Facts:
How much do we really know?
The reconstruction I have offered in The Ruin
and
Conquest of Britain as told by the Primary Sources is an attempt to
reconcile the accounts of all
of the primary (and the early secondary) sources. But, as noted there,
these sources are of varying reliability. Because of the nature of the
times, only contemporary or near-contemporary sources can be regarded
as
reliable. This reduces the available sources considerably.
Specifically,
the core texts for the period from the end of the Roman period (410)
into
the mid 6th century now become:
The Ruin of Britain by Gildas
The Gallic Chronicle (anonymous)
The Life of Germanus by Constantius
The letters of Sidonius
The History of the Goths by Jordanes
The History of the Wars by Procopius
Of these, only the first three actually report any events in Britain.
Unfortunately,
the source upon which we have to rely most heavily is Gildas. It is
unfortunate
because he was not writing history, but rather a polemic against the
morals
of his countrymen. There are no absolute dates in his text, and periods
of time are generally marked in vague terms. The one instance of a
specific
time period is embedded in prose so convoluted that its meaning is not
clear. It is not even certain whether it is legitimate to treat his
text
as a narrative at all, but, as Dumville has opined, we seem to have no
other option if we wish to use it constructively. Bearing this in mind,
we can give the following outline, which indicates the brackets in
which
events may have occurred.
408 x 410
From hereon Britain is subject to raids by Scots, Picts, and Saxons.
425 x 454
The Britons appeal to Aetius, the master of the soldiers in Gaul, for
aid against the "barbarians". Whether this is the Picts and Scots (as
Gildas
says) or the Saxons depends on the placing of the events here. The
dates
here are the dates that Aetius' was in power. If the "thrice consul"
quote
by Gildas is taken at face value then a date after 446 would be
required.
429
St. Germanus visits Britain to combat the Pelagian heresy, and leads
local forces to defeat raiders, allegedly Picts and Saxons. Apart from
this, his visit is unremarkable; Britain would appear to still be part
of the Roman world.
410 x 460
The Britons inflict a defeat on the invading barbarians. The earliest
possible date for this after the end of effective Roman authority is
410,
when it would correspond to Zosimus noting that "the Britons ... armed
themselves and ran many risks to ensure their own safety and free their
cities from the attacking barbarians". The latest date is shortly after
the latest possible date for the appeal to Aetius, which follows from
assuming
that Gildas has got the Aetius quote correct and in context. In any
case,
according to Gildas this victory is followed by a period of prosperity,
presumably at least a decade or so.
435 x 447
St. Germanus perhaps visits Britain a second time. No war
or
devastation is reported.
440 x 445
According to the Gallic chronicle, large parts of Britain have fallen
into Saxon hands. Whether this designates a particularly large and
prolonged
raid, a treaty for establishing federate troops, or a military
take-over
depends upon one's interpretation of other events.
c.480
According to Constantius, Britain is a prosperous island.
420 x 505
Following the period of prosperity, there is the threat of renewed
Pictish raiding, and then a plague.
425 x 510
Following the plague, a "proud tyrant", probably by the name of
Vortigern,
is in power as the leader of a council of Britain. Three keels of
Saxons arrive at the invitation of Vortigern, to fight against the
Picts
and Scots. They are settled in the East of the Island. Their leaders
are
perhaps Hengest and Horsa (Bede). Reinforcements subsequently arrive.
469
At the invitation of the Roman Emperor, Riothamus, "king of the
Britons",
leads a force of considerable size into the heart of Gaul "by way of
the
Ocean" (Jordanes). It is hard to see how one could infer from this that
Riothamus was a king of Brittany, as many authors have. In any case, he
confronts the Visigoths in battle but is beaten and retreats into
Burgundy.
430 x 525
The Saxon revolt. Britain is plundered, even as far as the west coast.
The date is "a long time" after the reinforcement which followed the
advent,
according to Gildas. Presumably at least 5, probably less than 30
years.
Following this, Britons flee into the mountains and forests, or
overseas.
The upper limit is set by the latest possible date for Gildas' writing
of the The Ruin of Britain (see below).
432 x 527
The British rally under the leadership of Ambrosius Aurelianus,
challenge
the Saxons to battle and defeat them. The date is "a while" (presumably
at least a couple of years) after the Saxon revolt. Then follows a
period
(of considerable time, perhaps 43 years) of fluctuating fortunes in war
until Badon.
437 x 547
The siege of mount Badon in which the Saxons are defeated. Gildas is
born. Thereafter Britain is partitioned between Saxon and Briton, and
there
is little fighting between them. But civil wars continue, and cities
are
largely deserted. Note that we cannot mention Arthur here, as he is not
mentioned in any of the contemporary sources. The date for Badon is at
least say 5 years, perhaps 43 years after Ambrosius' victory.
530 x 545
Angles, Frisians and Britons have migrated in considerable
numbers from Britain to France (Procopius).
480 x 575
Gildas writes The Ruin of Britain bemoaning the morals of his
countrymen. This is at least say 27 years and perhaps 43 years after
Badon.
It is therefore probably at least say 48 (=5+43) years after Ambrosius'
victory. This is also implied by the fact that Gildas says that those
who
witnessed the Saxon revolt and the Ambrosian rally have died and "an
age
succeeded them which is ignorant". A date for Gildas' composition
of The Ruin of Britain any later than about 575 would be
incompatible
with the reliably known history of Bede from the beginning of the
English
conversion (597) on.
590
The English are in control of most of Southern England.
This chronology shows the extreme uncertainty of reconstructing events
in Britain in the period 410 to 550. Vortigern's rise to power, the
appeal
to Aetius, the advent of the Saxons, their revolt, defeat by Ambrosius
and defeat at Badon could all (in different schemes) be assigned dates
in the 450s. Of course in any given reconstruction, these events would
be widely separated in time. The greatest uncertainty occurs for the
battle
of Badon, which cannot be pinned down even to within one century.
To illustrate how unconstrained the above chronology is, I have
given
below some fragments from alternate schemes which manufacture the
history
in greater detail. They all hinge on (and hence are identified by) the
position of Riothamus' doings in Gaul in relation to the Saxon revolt,
Ambrosius' victory, and the battle of Badon. Number 5 is closest to the
chronology proposed by Dumville, although he has the Saxon advent even
later (480x490).
1. Riothamus = "Arthur" (successor to Ambrosius)
410 Picts and Scots
defeated
410s Age of abundance
425 Vortigern comes to power
428 Saxons under Hengest
are invited (Saxon advent)
430s Saxons reinforced
445 Saxons revolt
446 Appeal to Aetius for
aid against Saxons
450 Ambrosius' victory over
Saxons
465 British victory at Badon
469 Riothamus (victor at
Badon) leads fatal expedition to Gaul
508 Gildas writes his letter.
2. Riothamus = Ambrosius
427 Appeal to Aetius for
aid
against Picts and Scots
430s Age of abundance
445 Saxon advent
460 Saxon revolt
465 Ambrosius' victory over
Saxons
469 Riothamus = Ambrosius
leads fatal expedition to Gaul
3. Riothamus = John Reith
450 Saxon advent
463 Saxon revolt
465 British nobles abandon
Britain, taking the vanquished army to Brittany
469 Riothamus (Breton leader)
is defeated by Visigoths
470 Ambrosius' victory over
Saxons
4. Riothamus = "Vortimer" (successor to Vortigern)
457 Saxon advent
469 Riothamus (successor
to Vortigern) leads fatal expedition to Gaul
471 Saxon revolt
475 Ambrosius' victory over
Saxons
5. Riothamus = predecessor to Vortigern
446 Appeal to Aetius for
aid
against Picts and Scots
450 Victory over Picts and
Scots
450-70 Age of abundance
469 Riothamus, high-king
of the Britons, leads fatal expedition to Gaul
470 Vortigern comes to power
471 Saxons advent
477 Saxons revolt
480 Ambrosius' victory over
Saxons
496 British victory at Badon
540 Gildas writes his letter.
Some (e.g. John Morris) would exclude many of these scenarios on the
basis of the archaeological evidence. In particular, Morris claimed
that
substantial Saxon settlement must have begun before c.430, and that the
battle of Badon must have been towards the end of the 5th century. Most
would now see this as misplaced confidence in the dating of saxon
cemeteries,
and perhaps even misinterpretation of the data (as far as the
abandonment
of midland settlement in the early 6th century is concerned). Despite
these
misgivings, one must conclude that any scenario (as for example, that
by
Dumville) which has the first settlement of Saxons in Britain in the
second
half of the 5th century would want to have a great deal going for it
from
the textual evidence in order to be accepted in the face of the
archaeological
record. This still leaves a great deal of leeway to historians, and
story-tellers,
and the story told by the later primary sources (as reconstructed by
me)
fits relatively easily within the constraints applied by what we know
to
be genuine history.
Return to The Ruin and Conquest of Britain main
page